What are the minimum emissions savings you can achieve using ECO Delivery Air by replacing 100% fossil fuel?
LinkedIn
Facebook
X.com
WeChat
Email
- We guarantee CO2e savings of at least 65% well-to-whell (WTW), compared to regular fossil fuel in line with Article 25 of the EU Renewable Energy Directive (2018/2001). WTW is a metric encompassing entire lifecycle emissions of a fuel, including upstream emissions from fuel production and transportation.
Why do we account CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent) and not CO2 (carbon dioxide)?
- Maersk has committed to Science Based Targets (SBTi) and is reporting in line with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, we work with CO2e and not CO2. During the combustion of fossil fuel not only CO2 is emitted but also additional greenhouse gases e.g. nitrous oxide, methane etc. which are not reduced by combustion of Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF).
本資訊是否實用？
相關常見問題
Are there any changes/compromises in my operations by using ECO Delivery Air ? Are there any minimum requirements/volumes for ECO Delivery Air ? Does ECO Delivery Air offer a possibility of replacing less than 100% fossil fuel? How do we handle customer data and ensure it is treated confidentially? How do you calculate the emissions and what is included? How do you ensure the SAF we procure meets certain sustainability requirements of our customers ? How does the Emissions Studio work? How is ECO Delivery Air invoiced ? In which geographical region/lane can I use ECO Delivery Air? Is ECO Delivery Air independently verified ? What commodities can be shipped using ECO Delivery Air ?Maersk.com 新使用者？
尋找與我們一起開始您的物流旅程所需的一切。
聯絡我們
聯絡我們
與支援團隊開啟即時交談
業務諮詢
請聯絡我們，我們會在隨後兩天內予以回复。